Time saved from weight loss on bike

I was cycling into town yesterday to sell some books at Blackwells. I must have been carrying 15 kg in my panniers. Cycling felt very different. It was a real effort to accelerate away from the traffic lights! With an extra 15 kg, you start to notice inclines on the road, you had never noticed before.

When the hill climb seasons starts and I get out my racing wheels, you really notice the difference when you swap a training wheel (1.3kg) for a lightweight wheel and tub (0.5kg) There is a noticeable difference.

In the 2010 national hill climb championship I was 0.9 seconds behind finishing on the podium. This was an unfortunate experience as it has always justified to myself spending a lot of money on saving weight….

This is a look at how much time and effort we can save by losing weight from either ourselves or our bike. We all know that saving weight helps us to get up hills, but how much will we save, if we can shave off 1 kg from our bike (or lose 10 kg off our tummy) ?

As a very rough rule of thumb, I was told by hill climb experts that on an ascent of 100 meters, saving 1 kg would give you an extra 2 seconds.

Analytic cycling have this program to calculate approx time saved from losing weight.

I put in figures for the

Rake hill climb


Photo PJ. 2012 National hill climb Championship


  • length: 900 metres.
  • Height gain: 100 metres
  • Average gradient 11%
  • Weight of rider: 61 kg
  • power 500 watts
  • Time saved – 1.7 seconds
  • Rake hill climb

This seems about right from my own unscientific tests with different weights on the bike.

By, the way, in 2005 on the Rake, Ben Greenwood beat Jim Henderson by 0.3 seconds. In other words the winning margin was 0.3 seconds or 170 grams.

However, it depends which way you look at it. If you are a leisure rider. Is it worth spending an extra £2,000 to save 1.7 seconds on a climb like the Rake? If it takes you 4.40, does it matter if it takes you 4.42?

Hardknott Pass


Hardknott pass is

  • 298m height gain
  • 2.2 km
  • Average gradient: 13%
  • If weight of rider 61 kg, power 300 watts.
  • 5kg less. Time saved = 46 seconds

However, it may be more time saved, when the gradient is variable. The analytical model assumes a constant gradient. But, Hardknott pass gets up to 30%. Weight saved is likely to be more important on variable gradients because of the effort to accelerate up the steeper parts.

What about a climb like Alpe d’Huez?

photo Maurice Koop

  • 14 km distance
  • Average gradient of 8.1% (max gradient 10.6%)
  • Height gain 1071 metres
  • power 400 watts
  • 1 kg saved = 24.16 seconds

Lose 10 kg and you will be able to climb Alpe d’Huez 4 minutes quicker. No wonder, heavier built riders like Mark Cavendish can never compete in the mountains.

Empirical Tests on Alpe D’Huez

According to this site (Alpe d’Huez weight). A rider tired climbing Alpe d’Huez at constant power of 275 watts. With 1.8 extra kg. It took an extra 66 seconds – which is very close to what the model suggests for 1.8 kg (64 seconds) .

Losing weight on the wheel

It is argued that saving weight on your wheel gives an even bigger advantage. This is because a wheel rotates at twice the speed of your bike. Therefore, extra power is needed in accelerating wheel weight. According to the empirical tests on Alpe d’Huez adding an extra 1.8 kg to wheels was an extra one minute slower than putting the weight on the bike. Therefore, if you can some lighter wheels, the benefit from the weight saved will be greater.

Test Results from Alpe d’Huez

  1.  52.01, 275w – Normal bike + 1.8Kg extra water in tyres(!)
  2.  51.34, 277w – Normal bike + 1,8Kg extra water on bike.
  3.  49.40, 278w  – Normal bike
  4. 50.38, 273w – Normal bike, reduced tyre pressure only 3 bars.

Other issues in weight saving

Power. When climbing it is not all about weight, but also power transfer. If you lose weight at the expense of rigidity and strength, the gains may be lose. When I switched from Aluminium frame to Trek Madone 6.9 Carbon fibre, I felt a stiffer more powerful bike – the weight was actually the same.

Aerodynamics. At certain speeds benefits from reducing aero drag outweigh weight savings. Thus a slightly heavier time trial bike may be faster than a road bike on a hill climb of 3%.

Tailwind. If there is a strong tailwind, the lighter riders will tend to do relatively better. This is because with a tailwind, power to weight ratios become more important than power to aerodynamic drag.


11 Responses to Time saved from weight loss on bike

  1. Stephen Gower January 27, 2015 at 4:19 pm #

    I’m just an Oxford cycling commuter, but I read your crazy racing stuff with interest! A couple of years ago as I was regularly towing 2 kids in a trailer up Rose Hill I wondered if I was getting fitter and it would make the journey easier when I didn’t have them. What do you think? Do you ever train with more weight so that you can remove it for the race? Do you want to borrow a trailer and two children?! (Sadly they don’t actually fit in the trailer any more)

    • tejvan January 27, 2015 at 6:02 pm #

      If you have a trailer with 2 kids, (let’s say 50kg) you will be using a lot more power to cycle home. So it will be more of a workout. I don’t bother putting on extra weight, hills are hard enough. But, you do notice a difference going from winter training bike (11kg with all stuff) to stripped down racing bike (5kg). So there is a psychological boost.

  2. Dan Bigham January 29, 2015 at 7:27 pm #

    I built a cycling TT ‘lap time simulator’ for my Masters motorsport engineering project. It loads the exact course profile so accounts for variations in elevation, amongst many other variables. Wheel inertia doesn’t actually make a huge difference to performance, yes it is more important than bike weight but not twice as important unfortunately. If you want any climbs or TTs analysing then feel free to drop me an email!

    • tejvan January 30, 2015 at 8:20 am #

      Cheers Dan. Interesting. Maybe there is a psychological benefit of spending a lot of money on light wheels!?

  3. Asaf April 11, 2015 at 10:02 am #

    I’d love to hear your thoughts about the tradeoffs of moving to a single chainring. I wanna make the same move but I fear two things:
    Lower chain efficiency
    Low cadence fir climbing, around 70

    Does the weight saving worth it?

  4. Paul Lefever April 1, 2017 at 10:49 am #

    In the last 11 months I have lost 20kgs in weight, I am now 79kg’s, and my watts have increased by 14%. FTP now is 277. This week I have been riding outside (turbo trainer has been put away) and wow the difference is so noticeable. Strava (segments) don’t lie! Best bit, I don’t ride an expensive carbon bike and I haven’t spent any money upgrading my 2005 bike I bought for £250 off ebay yet my times have improved massively and I feel so much better on the bike. Now I can justify getting a new bike!

  5. renanda tribowo August 3, 2019 at 7:59 pm #

    i’m obliged for the post.Really looking forward to read more. can i share this ?


  1. Lightest wheels - - March 26, 2015

    […] Time saved from weight loss on bike […]

  2. Even more on hill climbs - - October 29, 2015

    […] The narrowness of the finishing results, unfortunately suggest that saving weight can definitely pay dividends for those at the sharp end. In a climb of 150 m height gain – 300 grams could be the equivalent of around 1 second. (Time saved weight loss) […]

  3. Size Does Matter | The Clydesdale - September 3, 2016

    […] rider can save roughly 3.2 seconds per mile of climbing for every 2.2 pounds extra a rider weighs (https://cyclinguphill.com/time-saved-weight-loss-bike/). This news was earth-shattering but also made sense. Why don’t the heavier sprinters with […]

  4. Hill climb bike 2016 + Video + Photos - - November 1, 2016

    […] You can roughly calculate time saved from weight loss […]

Leave a Reply